Tech · AI slop check

AI Slop Detector

Tick the linguistic markers present in a piece of writing — Podge will count the slop signals and tell you whether it reads as AI-generated.

Instant result Plain-English why Copyable takeaway
Tech 30 seconds Result card

AI slop check

Think about a specific piece of writing — article, email, social post.

What this means

This tool checks for ten markers associated with AI-generated text — from vocabulary tells and structural uniformity to the absence of specific detail and personal voice.

Formula used

Count of ten AI-text markers: em dash overuse, vocabulary tells, opener patterns, uniform structure, absent specifics, hedging, stock phrases, no voice, list compulsion, self-description.

Worked example

Uses 'delve', 'Certainly', heavy hedging, no specific detail, no personal voice, uniform paragraphs — six markers. Likely AI. One em dash and some hedging — one or two markers. Probably human.

Common questions

Why are em dashes a signal?
LLMs trained on large text corpora developed a strong preference for em dashes — used in this way — as a substitute for brackets or commas. This pattern became so characteristic that it is now one of the most commonly cited surface-level tells of AI-generated text, particularly in GPT-family models.

Can a human write text that triggers this detector?
Yes. Human writers who frequently use hedging language, avoid specific detail, or write in a very uniform style can trigger multiple markers. The tool is a heuristic based on patterns, not a forensic analysis. High scores are suggestive, not conclusive.

Plain-English summary

Tick the markers present in a piece of writing to get a verdict on whether it reads as AI-generated.

This section translates the result into a short, direct takeaway rather than leaving the page at a bare number.

Disclaimer: This tool identifies patterns statistically associated with AI-generated text. It cannot definitively determine whether text was AI-generated — human writers can share these patterns and AI text can avoid them. It is a heuristic, not a detection system.

Read the guide

How to spot AI-generated text — the patterns that give it away

AI-generated text has developed recognisable patterns. Here's what to look for and why these patterns emerged from the training process.

Read the guide

After this verdict

Try Fake Fan Detector next

Estimate whether a wave of hype looks organic, coordinated, or a little too carefully farmed.

Open the next verdict

Related instruments

Keep going

Fake Fan Detector

Estimate whether a wave of hype looks organic, coordinated, or a little too carefully farmed.

Open verdict

Astroturf Detector

Estimate whether a campaign, comment wave, or public outrage looks grassroots or manufactured.

Open verdict

Algorithm Tax Calculator

Estimate how much money, time, and attention a platform's recommendations are quietly extracting.

Open verdict