This tool uses UK context.
View US version →
Life · Catastrophising check
Catastrophising Checker
Is the worst case you're imagining in the realistic probability range? Takes the feared outcome, evidence for and against it, and returns a verdict.
Blank until you answer
Plain-English why
Copyable takeaway
What this means
This instrument starts blank so it does not judge a made-up example before you have entered your own situation.
Formula used
Amplification = (evidence_against - evidence_for) + severity_weight - prior_weight - coping_reduction
Worked example
Fearing redundancy after one difficult meeting, with nine reasons it won't happen and one that it might, but treating it as catastrophic and ignoring your ability to cope — scores as significant catastrophising.
Common questions
What is catastrophising?
Catastrophising is the cognitive pattern of imagining a feared outcome as more likely or more devastating than the evidence supports. It is a normal anxiety response that becomes a problem when it consistently distorts decision-making.
What does 'amplification' mean here?
Amplification is the gap between how bad you're treating the feared outcome as likely to be and how bad the evidence suggests it will actually be. High amplification means the imagined scenario is significantly worse than the realistic one.
Plain-English summary
Fill in the questions on the left to generate a verdict card.
This section translates the result into a short, direct takeaway rather than leaving the page at a bare number.
Related instruments
Keep going
Should I Send That Message Gauge
Paste the message and get a verdict on whether to send it, redraft it, or leave it alone.
Open verdictMain Character Risk Calculator
Estimate whether you are about to make somebody else's moment too much about you.
Open verdictShould This Go In The Group Chat?
Check whether a message belongs in the group chat or needs a smaller, calmer room.
Open verdict